Steeped in historical references to the ancient Silk Road connecting China and Europe, the initiative was introduced in to connect China and Central Asian countries. Already in , Beijing became an observer to the Arctic Council. As Beijing expands its BRI investments and seeks new routes through the Arctic, Washington is bound to see the security implications of China’s ambitions as a rising and far-ranging naval power. Press Room About Contact. That discontent is pushing Greenland away from Denmark and toward China.
China and Canada tend to the Arctic
Russia welcomes foreign partners in the development of the shelf and is preparing to defend their territories. As you know, Canada — Nordic country. The total length of its Arctic coastline is aboutmilesand the area of the Arctic territories it occupies the first place in the world. However, the official Ottawa not averse to chinese arctic investment canada its sphere of influence in the region. Foreign Minister John Baird said the day before that the UN Commission on the continental shelf application submitted according to which Canada is asserting itself on the 1. The very hidden under a layer of cold water mountain rangewhich Russia considers its. Chinese arctic investment canada insistence is understandable : after all, in U.
A Global Arctic? Chinese Aspirations in the North
This international intergovernmental organization has already become an essential structure for decision-making in the Arctic region. China entered the Arctic Council as an observer in , despite being a non-Arctic state. The approval of Beijing’s bid was a result of the realization of a long-term strategy, designed by the PRC in order to acquire the access to Arctic governance. The steps of this strategy are traced in the paper, too, as the authors analyze what methods China used to gain the favor of Arctic states the Council permanent members: primarily Denmark, Iceland and Russia and, later, Sweden, Canada and Finland. The research is based on the study of a large number of sources: China ‘s official declarations, publications of Chinese experts, multilateral documents of the Arctic Council, bilateral documents, official reports, as well as the up-to-date media sources of China and of the Council members it interacts with in the most intensive way. The paper demonstrates how trade and investment deals, along with the inclusion of specific formulations in bilateral agreements, helped the PRC to advance towards its goals in the Arctic. These goals for China primarily include the access to natural resources of the Arctic shelf and the use of the Northern Sea Route for cheaper and faster goods supplies to Europe.
This international intergovernmental organization has already become an essential structure for decision-making in the Arctic region. China entered the Arctic Council as an observer indespite being a non-Arctic state.
The approval of Beijing’s bid was a result of the realization of a long-term strategy, designed by the PRC in order to acquire the access to Arctic governance. The steps of this strategy are traced in the paper, too, as the authors analyze what methods China used to gain the favor of Arctic states the Council permanent members: primarily Denmark, Iceland and Russia and, later, Sweden, Canada and Finland.
The research is based on the study of a large number of sources: China ‘s official declarations, publications of Chinese experts, multilateral documents of the Arctic Council, bilateral documents, official reports, as well as the up-to-date media sources of China and of the Council members it interacts with in the most intensive way.
The paper demonstrates how trade and investment deals, along with the inclusion of specific formulations in bilateral agreements, helped the PRC to advance towards its goals in the Arctic.
These goals for China primarily include the access to natural resources of the Arctic shelf and the use of the Northern Sea Route for cheaper and faster goods supplies to Europe.
At the same time, the open declaration of these goals can be attributed only to the present stage of China ‘s policy, while at earlier stages Beijing in some way disguised its objectives by emphasizing the need for environmental cooperation and joint research as the top priorities of its Arctic policy, and promoted its own probable participation in these activities. Having acquired the observer status, China has intensified its Arctic policy considerably by expanding comprehensive Arctic-related research projects, organizing new expeditions and strengthening bilateral ties with Russia and other Arctic states.
Meanwhile, this situation can result in various problems of regional and global scale. The fact that Chinawith its intensive Arctic policy, and several other non-Arctic states have obtained the Council observer status, can act as a precedent, used by non-Arctic states with powerful economies all over the world, or as a ground for complicated disputes and conflict for the probable future exploitation of the resources of the Arctic.
The latter may start even earlier, for example, thanks to Russian-Chinese oil or gas deals, which can expose the region to environmental risks. And some conflicts have already started to occur in bilateral relations: Chinadespite being a non-Arctic state, started pressurizing Russia to provide special privileges for shipping by the Northern Sea Route. DOI: The Arctic Council.
Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration. Polar Research Institute of China. Jakobson L. Arctic Council 7th Ministerial Meeting. Nuuk, Greenland. Troms0, 28 April Statement by H. Blank S. Erickson A. Juola C. The Arctic Migratory Birds Initiative.
Workplan Kai Sun. East Asia — Arctic relations: boundary, security and international politics. Ontario : Center for International Governance Innovation, Sigfusson A. Climate change is opening up new opportunities and challenges in the Arctic. Is the United States ready to lead? Ksenia G. Chinese arctic investment canada, Ural Federal University named after B. Yeltsin Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation. E-mail: ksenia-kgm mail. Anna Ye. Ivanova, Ural Federal University named after B.
The steps of this strategy are traced in the paper, too, as the authors analyze what methods China used to gain the favor of Arctic states — the Council permanent members: primarily Denmark, Iceland and Russia and, later, Sweden, Canada and Finland.
The research is based on the study of a large number of sources: China’s official declarations, publications of Chinese experts, multilateral documents of the Arctic Council, bilateral documents, official reports, as well as the up-to-date media sources of China and of the Council members it interacts with in the most intensive way.
At the same time, the open declaration of these goals can be attributed only to the present stage of China’s policy, while at earlier stages Beijing in some way disguised its objectives by emphasizing the need for environmental cooperation and joint research as the top priorities of its Arctic policy, and promoted its own probable participation in these activities.
The fact that China, with its intensive Arctic policy, and several other non-Arctic states have obtained the Council observer status, can act as a precedent, used by non-Arctic states with powerful economies all over the world, or as a ground for complicated disputes and conflict for the probable future exploitation of the resources of the Arctic. And some conflicts have already started to occur in bilateral relations: China, despite being a non-Arctic state, started pressurizing Russia to provide special privileges for shipping by the Northern Sea Route.
Arctic Council official website. A backgrounder. Accessed: 1. Yag’ya, V. International Relations. Accessed: Jakobson, L.
List of Participants. Co-Chair’s Summary. Arctic Council Secretariat. Tromse: ACS. Barents Observer. Tongji University. Center for Polar and Oceanic Studies.
Nablyudateli [Observers]. In Russian. In Chinese. Blank, S. The Diplomat. Accessed: 3. Erickson, A. The Wall Street Journal. Guschin, A. The Telegraph. Fenenko, A. VestnikMoskovskogo universiteta.
Series International Relations and World Politics. Shakleina, T. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. Juola, C. Eye on the Arctic. Losyukov, A. In: Sbornik rossiysko-kitayskikh dokumentov. Moscow: Olma Media Grupp. Innovative portal of the Urals Federal District.
Romanyuk, D. Vekovoyput’Kitaya kprogressu i modernizatsii [China’s century-long path to progress and modernization]. Proceedings of the XIX international conference. Klinton rasskazala, kto i kak dolzhen delit’ «arkticheskiy pirog » [H. Clinton told who and how should divide the «Arctic pie»]. RIA Novosti. Russia Today. Ivanov, I. Aziatskie igroki v Arktike: interesy, vozmozhnosti, perspektivy.
Komleva, N. Arktika i Sever. China Daily. China-Nordic Research Center. Workplan — International Radio of China translated version. Day Bingo. Rossiyskaya gazeta. News portal of the Communist Party of China. Shanghai Institute of International Studies. Ontario: Center for International Governance Innovation.
China»s policy in the Arctic Council
Fast-forward three years to the signing of the Iceland-China free trade agreement. The Chinese are implementing a threefold strategy to meet these goals. The EU did so much earlier using similar language. Home Commentaries Economy Watch. No third category exists, and claiming otherwise entitles China to absolutely nothing,» he said, noting that Investmejt nearest border is some miles 1, kilometers from the Arctic Circle. Eastern Seaboard, or be used for Chinese nuclear submarines.
Comments
Post a Comment